"We know that there is a massive literature, providing a high level of scientific certainty, for each of eight pathophysiological effects caused by non-thermal microwave frequency EMF exposures. This is shown in from 12 to 35 reviews on each specific effect, with each review listed in Chapter 1, providing a substantial body of evidence on the existence of each effect." Martin Pall, PhD
- Attack our nervous systems including our brains leading to widespread neurological/neuropsychiatric effects and possibly many other effects. This nervous system attack is of great concern.
- Attack our endocrine (that is hormonal) systems. In this context, the main things that make us functionally different from single celled creatures are our nervous system and our endocrine systems – even a simple planaria worm needs both of these. Thus the consequences of the disruption of these two regulatory systems is immense, such that it is a travesty to ignore these findings.
- Produce oxidative stress and free radical damage, which have central roles in essentially all chronic diseases.
- Attack the DNA of our cells, producing single strand and double strand breaks in cellular DNA and oxidized bases in our cellular DNA. These in turn produce cancer and also mutations in germ line cells which produce mutations in future generations.
- Produce elevated levels of apoptosis (programmed cell death), events especially important in causing both neurodegenerative diseases and infertility.
- Lower male and female fertility, lower sex hormones, lower libido and increased levels of spontaneous abortion and, as already stated, attack the DNA in sperm cells.
- Produce excessive intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i and excessive calcium signaling.
- Attack the cells of our bodies to cause cancer. Such attacks are thought to act via 15 different mechanisms during cancer causation."
EU 5G Appeal – Scientists warn of potential serious health effects of 5G
“We, the undersigned scientists, recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry. 5G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on top of the 2G, 3G, 4G, WiFi etc. for telecommunications already in place. RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.” Link to the full PDF
The Nuremberg Code states: "No Experimentation When Death or Injury are Likely" ....and yet 5G, with well known health risks, is being rolled out with NO pre-market safety testing by industry. THIS IS AN EXPERIMENT and WE ARE THE GUINEA PIGS.
Coming to Your Street
The FCC has proposed that its current exposure limits, which are based on ICNIRP's and have been unchanged since the mid -1990s (at least), are adequate for milliwave frequencies. Many letters and petitions have been submitted asking for scientific evidence that milliwaves are not dangerous. One letter was signed by more than 400 MDs and other professionals. This letter should be shared widely because the same argument applies to Health Canada and its failure to prevent 5G and milliwaves from being implemented without testing. No wireless device has ever been proven to be safe -- and scientific studies showing potential harm are ignored.
"The Institute of Building Biology recommends levels of one hundred thousand to one million times LESS than the FCC guidelines that are from 1991 research and they have refused to update. Lawsuits have been launched."
Wireless antennas emit microwaves — non-ionizing radio frequency (RF) radiation — and essentially function as cell towers. Each small cell can have over a thousand antennas that are transmitting simultaneously.
"This new mobile network will require millions of small cell antennas to be placed on lampposts and utility poles approximately every 100 m or 6 – 10 houses. This will result in involuntary exposure to wireless radiation for everyone 24/7, whether you use the service or not. "(k4st.ca/5g) (ehtrust.org)
Do you want one outside YOUR house, and along the streets where you and your children walk?
Canada has one of WORST Safety guidelines worldwide. The guidelines evasively sited by the FCC and Canada’s Safety Code 6, have never protected you, and that Italy, Russia and China and Switzerland, for instance, provide their citizens with protection 100 times greater than ours.
The danger of 5G is no exaggeration The direct radio and microwave frequencies these antennae will be modulating and pulsating at close range will be many times higher than current exposures. We can all exercise precautions when using existing technology, and recommendations for safe use can be found here. However, we will NOT be able to escape the 24 hour a day microwave exposure once these small cells are installed.
Testing and Evidence
To date, by industry admission, (article) there has been absolutely NO Industry testing to provide evidence of safety for this technology. As with lead, asbestos and tobacco, tens of thousands of independent peer reviewed scientific studies, many
dating back over 50 years, have shown clear evidence of harm from non-native (and non-ionizing) electromagnetic and radio frequencies. This evidence however has been suppressed and dismissed in the name of industry profit.
As stated in the Lancet: “Th[e] weight of scientific evidence refutes the prominent claim that the deployment of wireless technologies poses no health risks at the currently permitted non-thermal radio-frequency exposure levels. Instead, the evidence supports the International EMF Scientist Appeal by 244 scientists from 41 countries, who have published on the subject in peer-reviewed literature and collectively petitioned the WHO and the UN for immediate measures to reduce public exposure to artificial electromagnetic fields and radiation.” (Lancet Report)
Dr. Ollie Johansson of the Karolinska Institute clarifies, “These gadgets and their highly artificial electromagnetic fields interfere with normal brain function, learning and memory, fertility, cancer risks and have been shown to shatter the DNA in cells. They do not go well with bacteria, plants or other animals, quite far from it6a”.
He also recently submitted documents to the Penticton, BC Council regarding the urgent and serious truths of wireless harms and need to halt 5G noting, “It is a major mistake to omit the complexity of biological systems capable of responding to external electromagnetic stimuli otherwise than just through heating.”
Based on these facts, the Environmental Health Trust and the Children’s Health Defense jointly filed “historic legal action against the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) for its refusal to review their 25 year old guidelines, and to promulgate scientific, human evidence-based radio frequency (“RF”) emission rules that adequately protect public health from wireless technology radiation.” The Petition contends the agency’s actions are capricious and not evidence-based. A case of fraud has also been filed against the FCC by The Irregulators. More Articles.
Renowned scientist Paul Héroux, who has provided countless testimonials due to his ten years of industry experience, plus another 32 in the Faculty of Medicine at McGill University where he is director of Occupational Health, summed up the situation for the Penticton Council:
“I have unique insight in how the telecom industry works, and therefore shall be straightforward with you. Public health is already being harmed with 4G, Wi-Fi and cell towers. 5G would add to the present detrimental health effects of EMR. 5G is being pushed by industry simply to expand markets for cell phones and streaming video. The true usefulness of cell phones in terms of allowing convenient communications is already satisfied with present systems, and 5G can only be justified within the confines of an industrial plant, and should not be allowed in the human environment. I believe that proposed 5G rollouts will be one of the most serious matters you will have to vote on in your careers, both from the point of view of protecting public health and privacy." (See Full Article)
This graphic represents the problem Héroux points to succinctly: 70% of Non-Industry Studies show harmful effects whereas 68% of Industry studies show none.
Dr. Magda Havas, specialist in EMF research, Trent University Professor Emerita, explains this problem: "Unfortunately, the preeminent body for health at the federal level is Health Canada. Provincial Health Ministries defer to Health Canada when it
comes to the health effects of non-ionizing radiation. But Health Canada is not doing its job and hasn’t been doing its job for more than two decades. When government fails to do its job, we begin to experience a form of societal disintegration. When one segment of society becomes too powerful, we experience conflict and our freedom is compromised. When industry dictates medical procedure and the training of doctors, we are in deep trouble. And, unfortunately all three are happening in Canada and in many other parts of the world.”
We are at the beginning of one of the largest experiments ever conducted on this planet.
- Resonance: Being of Frequency (documentary. 1:28)
- 5G Roll-out: A High Tech EMF Front in the War Against Humanity?
- James Perloff Interviews Wireless Educator Cece Doucette about the Health Risks of Wi-Fi, the Coming 5G, and What People Can Do to Protect Themselves and Their Communities
- *** EHTrust - New Hampshire State Report on Health and Environmental Effects of 5g and Wireless Radiation
- Prof Olle Johansson: The Debate is Over. The spectrum of possible health problems arising is extraordinarily wide – from brain tumors and leukemia to exhaustion and just feeling uncomfortable."
- On the Clear Evidence of the Risks to Children from Smartphone and WiFi Radio Frequency Radiation
- 5G Wireless Technology: Is 5G Harmful to Our Health? New IEEE paper questions safety of exposure to 5G cell phone radiation
- Scientific Evidence that 5G and 4G densification is not safe "Effects have been found at levels that are legal and permissible. 5G will use frequencies that are currently in use as well as higher frequencies never used in any widespread way. "
- Friends of Amazon Creek: A good site with 5 important videos, and pdfs that outline the FCC substandard safety standards and its ties to the industry. Environmental Health Trust Challenges FCC Science Denial; FCC Technological Advisory Council member makes very awkward admission, and much more.
- 400 Medical and Public Health Professionals Oppose FCC Plans for Expanded Wireless Technology
- "Americans are entitled to know the full extent of any potential health risks associated with exposure to RF microwave radiation, particularly at this time when wireless companies are busy installing hundreds of thousands of new wireless antennas in close proximity to homes and apartments," the letter states, noting the Commission's obligation to ensure the "safety of life" for all Americans as set forth in the Communications Act of 1934. Press Release
- "Safety standards & recommendations, what are they, who determine them, on what basis, are they protecting us or industry & what do I think is safe."
- Worldwide Policies on Cell Phones, Electromagnetic Fields and Wireless
- Documents used in support of the Environmental Health Trust’s challenge to the FCC’s policy of science denial in setting safety standards for wireless radiation in the environment: https://friendsofamazoncreek.org/
- 5G and EMF Concern: Around the World in 80 Ways (or more)
- 5G Battle Over Health Risks In Switzerland
- EMF Academy Website: For Articles and G5 Updates
- Top Facts on 5G - Environmental Health Trust
- Zory's Archive - The History of thee Health Effects from RF and Microwave Radiation Research
- Physicians’ Health Initiative for Radiation and Environment
Founded by Dr. Erica Mallery-Blythe, Physicians’ Health Initiative for Radiation and Environment (PHIRE) is an independent association of medical doctors and associated specialists assembled for the purposes of improving education regarding health effects of non-ionizing radiation. We collate research produced globally on this issue, share and critique it and also conduct our own research.
- 5G loses steam, but what's next? Update on the infrastructure being sluggish, contrary to the initial hype, not worth the cost.
- Everything you need to know about 5G - Technical information. Produced by the IEEE.
- The power of the millietre waves. - Verison - Testing on 5G shows that mmW are passing through leaves and buildings more easily that previously thought.
- FCC Chair Tom Wheeler speaks at the National Press Club (2016) Will show how those at the FCC view 5G deployment
- 5G Roll-out: A High Tech EMF Front in the War Against Humanity?